I got a comment saying a project might not reward users because it's some other projects didn't. understand we all live in the PTSD of failed projects. Yesterday I got a drop with no liquidity to sell. The project committed absolute scam. Founders can be absolute criminals, but some of the have actual concept for products that could work. Scam founders doesn't automatically mean bad project I'm currently looking at @SIXR_cricket is seems the team is a credible one, and they're bringing cricket onchain with an onboarding process that involves the ton blockchain. The idea is a sportsFI economy that integrates web2 sports into web3 tokenization. Same for @brevis_zk useful tech? Absolutely, could they have a bad drop and scam founders, yes. The idea is that good tech should mean good founders, or at least increase the advantage. Getting a shout-out from vitalik himself and powering over 20 product using ZK (Pico prism) as its proof layer. The idea is that layer zero, one or two could do a good or bad drop, even optimistic roll-ups solution on arbitrum, it doesn't matter.