I got a comment saying a project might not reward users because it's some other projects didn't. understand we all live in the PTSD of failed projects.
Yesterday I got a drop with no liquidity to sell. The project committed absolute scam.
Founders can be absolute criminals, but some of the have actual concept for products that could work.
Scam founders doesn't automatically mean bad project
I'm currently looking at @SIXR_cricket is seems the team is a credible one, and they're bringing cricket onchain with an onboarding process that involves the ton blockchain.
The idea is a sportsFI economy that integrates web2 sports into web3 tokenization.
Same for @brevis_zk
useful tech?
Absolutely, could they have a bad drop and scam founders, yes.
The idea is that good tech should mean good founders, or at least increase the advantage. Getting a shout-out from vitalik himself and powering over 20 product using ZK (Pico prism) as its proof layer.
The idea is that layer zero, one or two could do a good or bad drop, even optimistic roll-ups solution on arbitrum, it doesn't matter.
1.71K
84
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.