Stargaze migration proposal to the Hub ends today!
Stakecito is voting Yes ✅
Why we support this proposal:
We support this proposal because it brings an immediately useful, battle tested, and widely adopted consumer application suite to the Cosmos Hub at a moment when the Hub needs real usage more than anything else. @StargazeZone delivers a complete marketplace, launchpad, creator studio, and name service on day one, together with thousands of collections and a large community that is culturally important across the entire ecosystem.
The migration increases Hub activity, activates new $ATOM utility across trading and minting, and provides long term development commitments backed by a team that has shipped consistently for years. The updated proposal also includes a realistic and forward looking roadmap that focuses on retail adoption, creator onboarding, multichain growth funnels, and a RWA strategy developed together with @cosmoslabs_io.
The funding structure is milestone based, fully capped, and protected by a multisig with community oversight. Any excess value or unused funds go back to the community pool. This creates a well controlled environment where the Hub receives measurable, high impact deliverables while maintaining accountability.
Above all, this proposal strengthens the Cosmos Hub in a practical and durable way. It adds real applications, new users, increased visibility, and a dedicated team building directly on the Hub’s core infrastructure. In our view, this is a strategic investment that accelerates ecosystem growth and positions the Hub as a home for meaningful consumer activity.
After seeing the modifications made to the @StargazeZone proposal, I am now in support of the proposal.
When I spoke to Ruwan and Brady from the Stargaze team, I made my position clear:
1. Moving to the Hub will not solve Stargaze’s problems, the chain doesn’t matter and won’t bring users.
2. Nothing changes if nothing changes, and there needs to be a new roadmap and growth plan to better guarantee success.
3. You cannot treat your ATOM payments as a speculative asset.
In response, they have added sections to the proposal on changing their marketing to be more D2C, and a RWA roadmap - which is something I think is the most promising for Stargaze’s future direction.
They have impressed me with their ability to change, receive feedback, and resilience in the wake of their founder leaving. As an ATOM holder and community member, I am willing to take the bet on them.
Mag
Don't forget to cast your vote!
⏳ Voting ends: Nov 26, '25
🗳️ Vote here:
750
3
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX n’est pas l’auteur du ou des articles cités et ne revendique aucun droit d’auteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni à titre d’information uniquement et ne représente pas les opinions d’OKX. Il ne s’agit pas d’une approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas être considéré comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation d’achat ou de vente d’actifs numériques. Dans la mesure où l’IA générative est utilisée pour fournir des résumés ou d’autres informations, ce contenu généré par IA peut être inexact ou incohérent. Veuillez lire l’article associé pour obtenir davantage de détails et d’informations. OKX n’est pas responsable du contenu hébergé sur des sites tiers. La détention d’actifs numériques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque élevé et leur valeur peut considérablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financière pour déterminer si le trading ou la détention d’actifs numériques vous convient.