how else could you get rekt as a YT-holder?
the project not launching =
• liquidity woes
• opportunity cost
• drawdown on yields
• points become redundant
while the leverage on yields and points can be enticing, the inherent risk is > PT/LP holders
didn’t think we’d see this for @Terminal_fi
anything can happen in crypto - we can be bullish but we also need to be objective
.@Terminal_fi wasn’t a rushed project.
It was fully built, audited, and ready, but the chain it depended on never launched.
When @convergeonchain didn’t go live, the whole plan lost its foundation.
They decided to shut it down the clean way:
> All deposits refunded 1:1
> Full codebase released
> No forced launch just to save face
> All rewards still given (@ethena_labs Sats, Etherfi points, sUSDe yield, minus the Terminal airdrop)
It sucks for everyone involved, but being honest now avoids a bigger mess later.
My take:
I was only in LPs, so I mainly lost opportunity time and terminal airdrop. YT holders took the real hit.
And yeah, this is a reminder:
> points mean nothing if the project never reaches TGE.
> YT isn’t a guaranteed printer
So ape into YT wisely, unexpected situations like this do happen.
We saw something similar with Level before it shut down, though the story was different. Level only returned deposits. Hopefully Terminal delivers all earned rewards and maybe compensates those who burned their YT.
Tough ending, but I respect the call.
Now we wait for updates on how much base yield we’ll actually receive.

846
7
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。


