You need to read this if you're a founder! 90% of tokens launched on Solana this year are at a loss But why? It's a mix of everything: - Airdrop sell pressure - VC raises that dilute supply to “ensure project longevity” - Lack of ownership, alignment, and trust (MetaDAO is solving this) If you don't want your token to end up like 99% of the others, you need to change the meta... ▫️ The @DeFiTuna Revenue-Share Model: DeFi Tuna holds the majority of its tokens and stakes them all. 100% of revenue is distributed linearly to stakers. + Community becomes true ambassadors + Holders can earn even when token trades sideways – Team takes on risk if early revenue is low ▫️ The @AviciMoney Buyback Model The Avici team has zero team tokens and no VC funding — only community investment. Revenue is used to buy back the token, creating organic demand. + Max community trust + Zero emissions – Team has limited token exposure (missing alignment) ▫️ The @ranger_finance MetaDAO Performance-Unlock Model Ranger will launch through MetaDAO with zero tokens at TGE. Team tokens only unlock when the token hits milestones (2x, 5x, etc.). + High community trust + Team is forced to deliver before earning upside – Harder to attract new hires due to limited equity or tokens There is no perfect tokenomics model. But all three of these are much much better than outdated schemes that hand 60%+ of supply to VCs and team members before the community ever touches it... If you still follow that model today, your token is already halfway to the graveyard Build trust. Align incentives. Give your community a reason to believe.
3,951
58
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。