GM fams I have been following the whole back and forth between Justin and the $EGLD side closely from the initial debate invite to the threads to the accusations and counter replies What I’ve noticed is something that keeps repeating in crypto whenever people try to address a serious issue it quickly becomes personal One side thinks they are defending truth the other thinks they’re defending integrity and suddenly it’s no longer about facts but pride @Justin_Bons made heavy claims $100M minted for a for profit company inflation broken promises @lucianmincu calls it misframed saying the minting is strategic and transparent The team responded calling it “calculated deception But if you strip away the noise you can see something valuable people care about this ecosystem They care about transparency about promises made about how much trust really matters in a decentralized world The truth is both can be wrong in tone and still right about what matters We should demand receipts before believing any “insider claim We should expect leaders to respond clearly when asked and we should keep debates open civil and evidence driven not ego driven So here’s my take → If the claims are true show the receipts → If they’re false, show the proof → Either way the truth deserves a stage not a shouting match Transparency > ego Facts > narratives Receipts > rhetoric And that’s what I’ll always stand by. Few understand this